Power to tackle invasions

Through the proposed Infrastructure Bill, we may soon be given more means to tackle the invasive non-native species (INNS) damaging the natural environment. Along with climate change and habitat destruction, they are one of the biggest global threats to biodiversity.

Himlalayan balsam is a major UK INNS - northeastwildlife.co.uk

Himlalayan balsam is a major UK INNS – northeastwildlife.co.uk

There are around 2,000 established non-native species in Britain. Most of these are benign, causing no problems; some are even beneficial to human survival – such as crops like barley and wheat. However, a few become invasive and have serious negative consequences for the natural environment, native fauna and flora, the economy and human health.

Many organisations have worked on this issue for years; spending large amounts of time and money trying to remove INNS from habitats, or lobbying Government to do more to deal with areas such as priority pathways and supporting management efforts.

Trade is a key pathway for INNS introductions. Sometimes this is accidental, as in the case of “hitchhikers” on or in products, packaging or vessels/vehicles being transported around the world. Sometimes a species is introduced deliberately, but with little or no understanding of the potential consequences, such as rhododendron in gardens.

A key problem with many INNS is their remarkable ability to adapt to a new environment and effectively spread through it, outcompeting native species for space and resources, and reducing biodiversity. This makes it very difficult to deal with INNS once they are established and can require major collaboration between landowners to manage/eradicate species across a large land area, in order to prevent them recolonising cleared patches from unmanaged ones.

In the past there have been no powers to ensure action takes place on private land where the owner has not allowed it. This can hamper long-term management and eradication efforts, and support continued damage to the environment. It can also prevent rapid response action against invasions by new species.

The best action against INNS is to prevent them getting into Britain in the first place, the next is to rapidly eradicate any INNS before they establish many or large populations, the least effective and most expensive method is the long-term management of species once they have a good hold in the environment – the three-tiered approach of prevention, eradication and control.

Giant hogweed can cause severe skin blisters (the lady hidden among the leaves is five feet tall) - Wikicommons, Mark Nightingale

Giant hogweed can cause severe skin blisters (the lady hidden among the leaves is five feet tall) – Wikicommons, Mark Nightingale

Some positive suggestions in the Infrastructure Bill, proposed by the Law Commission after looking at the new Scottish model, are to create powers that give statutory bodies the ability to enter into Species Control Agreements with landowners. These give a fixed period in which the owner must carry out eradication or management of INNS on their land, with an outline of actions they must and must not take. The statutory body will compensate them if needed.

If the landowner does not comply within the allotted timeframe, the statutory body has the right to issue a Species Control Order, carry out the work themselves and seek compensation from said landowner for any costs.

This may finally give us the ability to tackle INNS at a landscape scale. For example, Himalayan balsam is transported downriver through catchments. Therefore, there is little use in a landowner at the bottom of a catchment working hard to eradicate it from their land if one or more upstream are not, as reinvasion can and will occur.

These powers will also help support the new EU Invasive Alien Species Regulation, due to come into force next year. However, statutory bodies like Natural England and the Environment Agency are already struggling with big financial cuts and lack of staff and resources. The Woodland Trust wants the Government to ensure these powers are not only legislated for, but they are supported and actioned so they become an effective tool against INNS.

This is a serious problem that needs concerted and efficient action to protect native fauna, flora and habitats, and the ecosystem services they provide. Find out more about INNS in the Invasive species management in woodland habitats issue of Wood Wise.

Keep up to date on other aspects of the infrastructure bill by following our blog on our website. Sign up for scrapbook now, and tag your favourite posts, authors, and categories.

Kay Haw, Conservation Team


About Kay Haw

Assistant Conservation Adviser, Woodland Trust. Nature is my passion, especially woods and trees which are just amazing elements of life. One day (soon) I hope we humans learn to work in harmony with Mother Earth.
This entry was posted in Conservation, Government Affairs and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Power to tackle invasions

  1. Nicholas Heins says:

    Given the Government cut backs where is the money to come from to tackle what is a multi million pound problem? – some Local Authorities, The Government and even some SSSI/NNR/LNR etc. sites have been sleep walking through this problem for years, resulting in comparative Invasive mole hills turning into massive Invasive mountains!

  2. A number of years back the city of Seattle gave to the emperor of Japan a fish that was native to our environment for the ponds on the grounds of the palace as a gift to build a bond between our two peoples. Today the government of Japan spends several million dollars each year trying to control this species. We are hoping they will forget who gave them this gift.

  3. Derek West says:

    Invasive species are as you say one of the problems our natural environment is facing,I hope Central Government provides sufficient funding to address this problem.

  4. sherwoodforestcommunityvision says:

    Reblogged this on Sherwoodforestcommunityvision’s Blog and commented:
    Thanks Woodland trust.We certainly are aware of balsom and knotweed in Sherwood.

  5. LINDA DOLATA says:

    With regard to invasive species…. be aware that many of the mixes marketed as for example ‘native flower meadow’,’ native woodland mix’ etc are actually made with seeds from Northern and Eastern mainland Europe- often more vigorous or with brighter flowers or a longer flowering period- than the British equivalent subspecies, which they are therefore able to outcompete. it is arguable as to whether this is such a bad thing (for example with longer summers, insects need an available food source), but purists do need to be aware of the facts
    Linda Dolata

Sorry, comments are closed as we have moved to a new site: https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/blogs/woodland-trust/

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s