Ancient woodland – to designate or not to designate?

Ancient woodland is our richest land-based wildlife habitat, as well as one of the most important cultural links to our past, and once lost, cannot be replaced.  That’s why we’re calling on the Prime Minister to deliver better protection for England’s remaining ancient woodland, and one way he can do this is to deliver on the government’s promise to significantly increase the amount of ancient woodland designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).

Lesnes Abbey Woods

Lesnes Abbey Woods

Nearly a year after my post calling for better protection of ancient woodland, Owen Paterson has stated that the current level of protection is adequate, but sadly our experience is quite contradictory.  The Independent Panel on Forestry (IPF) noted “We are losing ancient woodland in England” and we currently have 443 cases of ancient woodland threatened by development.  Our experience has shown that it is only the “statutory designations” (SSSI, Special Protection Area (SPA), Special Area for Conservation (SAC), Ramsar sites) that give substantial protection from development pressure, and also from inappropriate and damaging management.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach (then Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, DEFRA) said in March 2012:

“Compared to other wildlife habitats, ancient woodlands are under-represented in the sites of special scientific interest (SSSI) series…. Work to identify which undesignated woodlands have potential to become SSSIs for their wildlife features is underway and being led by Natural England, in line with its statutory duty. It is likely that this work will result in more ancient woodlands being protected through designation as SSSI over the next few years.”

However, the IPF also noted in July 2012 that “SSSI protection only applies to 15% of our ancient woodlands, and as a habitat it is under represented compared to others… The current internal review of SSSI designations by Natural England may improve this, but in the meantime some of our most precious woodlands remain vulnerable.” Natural England monitor how much “priority habitat” is covered by SSSI designation (see Table 2a.4), and wood pasture and deciduous woodland are amongst those with the lowest proportion designated (12% each).

Natural England should have a clear target to significantly increase the proportion of ancient woodland under SSSI designation, and a set timescale in which to achieve it.  Natural England already hold and review the Ancient Woodland Inventory, and have added new sites to this where we or others have provided the evidence.  Increasing the proportion of recorded ancient woodland in SSSI status is affordable, though it may take some re-prioritisation of work.

We want to see better protection for all of our ancient woodland, not just the top tier SSSIs. The current reality is that we’re stuck with two tiers at the moment (possibly three if you include Local Wildlife Sites), so let’s press the government to deliver on their promise to put more in the top tier whilst still pursuing better protection for the ancient woodland remaining in the other categories.

In the next post in this series, Sian and Katharine will discuss how completing and extending the Ancient Woodland Inventory can also improve protection for ancient woodland.

You can help us keep up the pressure by sending your message to the Prime Minister now.


About Richard Barnes

Conservation Adviser, Woodland Trust
This entry was posted in Campaigning, Climate Change, Conservation and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Ancient woodland – to designate or not to designate?

  1. Pingback: Legislation would enable all of us to do more. | Woodland Matters

  2. jpeggytaylor says:

    For me all remaining ancient woodland and PAWS should be given full protection against development or bad management. Owen Paterson thinks it is adequately protected already?! He never heard about Oaken Wood, did he not?!! Or the numerous pieces of ancient woodland under direct threat from HS2?!! His attitude to ancient woodland was thrown into sharp relief when he announced that planting a few more saplings would make up for any lost ancient trees.

  3. michael barton says:

    a very positive approach

  4. Derek West says:

    So,Paterson thinks the level of protection for ancient woodlands is adequate,this shows how out of touch this goverment is with reality,I would suggest all ancient woodland has SSSI status.Its value for biodiversity makes this a valid cause.

Sorry, comments are closed as we have moved to a new site:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s