Crunch time for democracy

Today the House of Commons which theoretically gives us the chance to get involved in decisions that affect our daily lives is considering cutting local people out of planning decisions.

At root the Planning Bill is an attempt to speed up major infrastructure by cutting out the type of objections that can be raised at public inquiries.  If the reforms go through we could end up with an unelected, unaccountable body taking decisions on anything from major power stations, airports and trunk roads to reservoirs and incinerators.

The feeling from the Government is that local people opposing a plan for major infrastructure by challenging national policy is a problem. They believe local involvement in planning should be tightened up to the extent that people shouldn’t be able to challenge national policy at every stage of an application.

The changes could lead to a situation where you as a member of your local community, concerned about the plans to build an airport near your home would have the ability to complain about the colour of terminal but would have no say over where it goes. Because new “National Policy Statements” will already have been consulted on, the Government suggests that should mean that large scale developments will go ahead regardless of local opposition.

Cutting local people out of decision making is clearly anti-democratic, but it also threatens the environment including irreplaceable ancient woodland. Local people act as the eyes and ears of organisations like the Woodland Trust and they are often more effective in saving a cherished wood or green space. This move towards centralised planning means that the environment will almost inevitably lose out.

The threat of a revolt by Labour backbenchers has put the Government on the back foot and they have granted some concessions in the hope of being able to push the Planning Bill through. This evening we will have to wait and see if our representatives undermine our chances of creating sustainable places for people to live, or whether they recognise that we can not continue to dis-empower local people from issues affecting their community and environment.



About Ed Pomfret

Head of campaigns at the Woodland Trust. I run our campaigning work on issues such as climate change, aviation, planning reform and woods under threat.
This entry was posted in Planning and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Crunch time for democracy

  1. Pingback: Voices muted by the IPC could be heard once more «

  2. Anne Brooks says:

    Well done to the Woodland Trust for highlighting this issue. I don’t think people understand the full extent of what this decision means; they will only hear the Government saying that it’ll speed up the planning process (which it will) but won’t necessarily consider the implications and appreciate at what cost (until it affects them of course then it’ll be too late).

Sorry, comments are closed as we have moved to a new site:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s