Aberdeen appeal – Day 1

Day 1 of the appeal against the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route was certainly an interesting experience!
 
The Court of Session in Edinburgh is rather imposing, with a be-wigged judge in a fantastic red gown and a raft of similarly be-wigged QC’s and advocates. But the atmosphere was friendly and open; a civilised discussion rather than a heated argument.
 
Tuesday was devoted to the start of Road Sense’s argument that the amount of public participation in the process of choosing a final route was fatally flawed.  Much of the argument stems from the way that the Aarhus Convention (on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters) has been applied in the UK, and whether the Scottish Ministers complied with the Convention in the way the route of the AWPR was chosen.
 
Whilst complicated, it all sounded very compelling to me – but it’s the judge that needs to be convinced.  The appeal is due to last around six days. We will keep you up to date!

Have you had experience of fighting an appeal as a community group? What do you think about the AWPR? Please share your thoughts with us below, and do pass this post on.

About these ads

About Kaye Brennan

Senior Campaigner (Policy & Advocacy) for the Woodland Trust and Administrator, 'Woodland Matters' blog
This entry was posted in AWPR, Scotland, Woods Under Threat, WoodWatch and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Aberdeen appeal – Day 1

  1. Pingback: Paper, paper paper: Aberdeen appeal day 2 «

What do you think about this topic?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s